Subordinates’ Use of Upward Influence Tactics as a Predictor of Abusive Supervision: A Victim Precipitation Perspective

dc.contributor.advisorLee, Kibeom
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Julie
dc.contributor.committeememberPerlow, Richard
dc.contributor.committeememberOgunfowora, Babatunde O.
dc.contributor.committeememberChapman, Derek S.
dc.contributor.committeememberWeinhardt, Justin M.
dc.date2018-11
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T14:19:15Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T14:19:15Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-13
dc.description.abstractVictim precipitation theory postulates that to fully understand why abusive supervision occurs, it is imperative to consider how subordinates can participate in the sequence of events that lead to their becoming targets of supervisors’ aggressive actions. Yet, only a handful of studies have explored whether subordinates’ own behaviours might evoke this type of response. To this end, this dissertation explored if, and under what conditions, subordinates’ behaviours elicited abusive responses from their supervisors. Drawing on the taxonomy of upward influence tactics, I tested the role of assertiveness and ingratiation as two behavioural predictors of abuse across two independent studies. In Study 1, I collected self-report data from a sample of full-time supervisors using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform (N = 204). Relying solely on their subjective interpretations, supervisors who perceived their subordinates to be assertive reported being more abusive because this behaviour threatened their role in the organization. On the other hand, supervisors who believed their subordinates ingratiated towards them were less likely to be abusive because they viewed these individuals as less threatening. Because abusive supervision is frequently observed from the subordinates’ perspective, and because there is evidence to suggest that abuse should be examined from a relational perspective, Study 2 collected responses from supervisor-subordinate dyads (N = 146). In this study, subordinates’ self-ratings of assertiveness were the only behaviour that was directly related to abusive supervision. Moreover, across both studies, there was no evidence to support the assertion that supervisor perceptions of power in the organization, or their social dominance orientation moderated the indirect relationship between assertiveness and abusive supervision through perceived threat. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationChoi, J. (2018). Subordinates’ use of upward influence tactics as a predictor of abusive supervision: A victim precipitation perspective (Doctoral thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada). Retrieved from https://prism.ucalgary.ca. doi:10.11575/PRISM/32949en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/32949
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/107786
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyArts
dc.publisher.facultyGraduate Studies
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Calgaryen
dc.publisher.placeCalgaryen
dc.rightsUniversity of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.
dc.subject.classificationPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationPsychology--Industrialen_US
dc.titleSubordinates’ Use of Upward Influence Tactics as a Predictor of Abusive Supervision: A Victim Precipitation Perspective
dc.typedoctoral thesis
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Calgary
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
ucalgary.item.requestcopytrue

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ucalgary_2018_choi_julie.pdf
Size:
1.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: