Comparative Analysis of Institutional Policy Definitions of Plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University Study

dc.contributor.authorEaton, Sarah Elaine
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-04T21:30:09Z
dc.date.available2018-04-04T21:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-17
dc.description.abstractThis article shares the findings of a study investigating institutional policy definitions of plagiarism at twenty English-speaking Canadian universities. The types of primary sources consulted for this study included: (1) university academic calendars for 2016–2017, (2) institutional policies on academic misconduct, and (3) student academic codes of conduct. Sources were analyzed in comparative tabular and narrative form. Results show wide variation in institutional definitions of pla- giarism as a specific subset of academic misconduct. The conclusions call for a coordinated effort among Canadian universities to develop a common framework of academic integrity that includes clear and explicit definitions for plagiarism, as well as other forms of academic dishonesty, that are consistent across provinces.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/35655
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1880/106472
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInterchange: Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Educationen_US
dc.publisher.facultyWerklund School of Education
dc.publisher.hasversionPublisher's version
dc.publisher.policyhttps://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/authors-rights/self-archiving-policy/2124en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Institutional Policy Definitions of Plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University Study. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 48(3), 271-281. doi:10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7en_US
dc.rightsUnless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.subjectplagiarismen_US
dc.subjectacademic integrityen_US
dc.subjectacademic misconducten_US
dc.subjecthigher educationen_US
dc.subjectCanadaen_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Institutional Policy Definitions of Plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University Studyen_US
dc.typejournal article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Eaton-2017.pdf
Size:
767.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: